Nate Silver gets philosophical. By and large, I think there's some very good stuff in this post (as there typically is over at 538.
Of particular interest is the breakdown between rational (pragmatic?) progressivism and radical (annoying) progressivism. In the 'Rational Progressive' column, note the inclusion of the term 'elitist' along with words like 'empirical' and 'conversational.' I can very much see where the accusation is levied from. Being cooly descriptive of someone else oftentimes implies some kind of almost clinical distance. For the person being described, this often brings with it a feeling of uneasiness. No one likes the sensation of being put under the microscope; that is, the sensation one gets when overhearing friends talk about them in the next room.
What I find to be a more vicious habit, however, is the kind of populism that I often find associated with ideologues. To describe a person, or set of people based upon what one has observed or considered can often rightly be called elitism, or at least carry with it a feeling of elitism if the care is not taken to frame ideas carefully and thoughtfully. To describe a person, or set of people based upon what one ideologically demands to be true, however, is a different thing entirely. It implicitly robs the entity being described of agency and, ultimately humanity. It's also really fucking insufferable. Consider obnoxious college sophomores who incessantly pontificate about how "[T]he unspoken plight of 'the poor.'" (full disclosure: at one point in my life I had walked more than a few steps down this path). Oftentimes in these worldviews, points of argument are not questions to be answered so much as they are soapboxes to stand on. It has taken the individual or group of individuals being described, and not put them under the microscope but made them pawns in the narrative of the storyteller.
Or maybe not. I don't mean to sound so definitive, but it's a way of thinking that I find ultimately counterproductive. That being said, there's a really sweet blog coming down the pipeline about the French invasion of Russia in 1812. --Watch out!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Listen to Baltimore Is the New Brooklyn by JC Brooks & The Uptown Sound for free.
Official Films of the D10
- Monkey Shines
- Full Moon High
- Jason and the Argonauts (2000 - Dennis Hopper Version)
- Sssssss!
- The Dentist 2
- Aussie Park Boyz
- Shivers
- Last House on the Left
Internet Friends
Another, Less Sexual D10 Blog
Links -- Sports
Links -- Religion
Hollywood's Haunts
Boots' Boudoirs
Contributors
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(124)
-
▼
February
(54)
- Michael Steele, ctd.
- A Minnesota Rube in Tanzania, ctd.
- Cultural Studies, ctd.
- In other news
- Let's Read Blogs During the Week
- Let's Go To Bars During the Week
- Yikes
- Thought for the Day
- More on Jim Bunning
- Awkward Moments in Oratory, Vol. I
- Annotated Haikus!
- This Is Not a Good Idea
- Road Trip Friday
- One-Armed Midgets?
- No title
- Wired Blog Response
- Of the People, By the People, For the People
- Progressivism v. Progressivism, ctd.
- I Love Urban Dictionary
- Progressiveism v. Progressivism.
- The Worst Thing Ever
- Holy Shit!, ctd.
- The Worst Thing Ever
- D-10 investigative reporting
- Creepy Obama Shit, ctd.
- Creepy Obama Shit: The Untold Story
- Creepy Obama Shit, ctd.
- Creepy Obama Shit, ctd.
- Creepy Obama Shit, ctd.
- Creepy Obama Shit, Part I
- My Senator
- Holy Shit!
- Photo Phun!
- Vive L'Revolucion!
- "Uh huh, yeah Harvey. Yeah. Uh huh....
- More Than a Feeling - Part II
- Don't Ever Date an Adopted Girl
- Holy Shit
- This article couldn't be more wrong
- Interesting Blog Post
- Music Friday
- Wikipedia Tidbit of the Week
- EVHL League Play Begins
- Joe Biden Goes Off Message
- Monday Cartoon
- More Than a Feeling - Part I
- The Guantanamo of My Blog Inauguration
- Cheekbones We Can Believe In, ctd.
- Proof poitive
- A Stimulating Discussion
- Cheekbones We Can Believe In
- Play it cool
- Please
- Meanwhile, in Candyland
-
▼
February
(54)
No comments:
Post a Comment